Files
dev-process/templates-de/qualitaet/Review-Protokoll-vorlage.md
T
Stefan Lohmaier 8ea3f3d8f4 templates-de: German document templates, moved in from ownCloud
The 25 files under templates-de/ lived in ~/ownCloud/Persönlich/slohmaier.com/vorlagen/
with no version control. They are the German-language counterpart of the
templates renamed to English in 247b831 — this repo already describes itself as
holding the ASPICE 4.0 / ISO 26262 methodology, templates and tools, so a
second home for templates would have been a duplicate.

Structure preserved as found (business/, engineering/, projekt/, qualitaet/).
No file renamed, no template content changed.

Not moved: vorlagen/slohmaier-doc-template.docx was byte-identical (MD5
31b2d0748eadf0314babf469725ee0b1) to templates-word/slohmaier-doc-template.docx
already in this repo.

Path references fixed in templates-de/README.md, which pointed at locations
that no longer exist: the ownCloud cp examples now clone from Gitea, the
generator script name follows the vorlagen/ -> templates/ rename
(generate_word_vorlagen.sh -> generate_word_templates.sh), the edit workflow
names templates/ and templates-de/ instead of the removed ownCloud copy, and
the master template is referenced at ../templates-word/.
2026-07-31 09:55:33 +02:00

75 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

# Review-Protokoll
| Feld | Wert |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Datum | [YYYY-MM-DD] |
| Review-Art | [Peer Review / Technical Review / Inspektion] |
| Moderator | [Name] |
| Protokollfuehrer | [Name] |
---
## 1. Teilnehmer
| Name | Rolle | Anwesend |
|---------------------|--------------------------|----------|
| [Name] | Moderator | Ja / Nein |
| [Name] | Autor | Ja / Nein |
| [Name] | Reviewer | Ja / Nein |
| [Name] | Reviewer | Ja / Nein |
## 2. Reviewtes Work Product
| Feld | Wert |
|-------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Work Product | [z.B. Architektur-Dokumentation, Modul XY, Anforderungen SWR-040 bis SWR-060] |
| Version / Commit | [Version oder Git-Commit-Hash] |
| GitLab-Referenz | [MR-Link / Wiki-Seite / Issue-Nummern] |
## 3. Review-Vorbereitung
| Reviewer | Vorbereitungszeit (h) | Vorbereitung abgeschlossen |
|-------------------|-----------------------|----------------------------|
| [Name] | [X] | Ja / Nein |
| [Name] | [X] | Ja / Nein |
## 4. Findings
| ID | Beschreibung | Schwere | Verantwortlich | Fälligkeit | Status |
|------|---------------------------------|-------------------|----------------|-------------|-------------|
| F-01 | [Beschreibung des Findings] | Critical / Major / Minor | [Name] | [Datum] | Offen |
| F-02 | [Beschreibung des Findings] | Critical / Major / Minor | [Name] | [Datum] | Offen |
| F-03 | [Beschreibung des Findings] | Critical / Major / Minor | [Name] | [Datum] | Offen |
### Schweregrade
- **Critical:** Sicherheitsrelevant oder funktional falsch. Muss vor Freigabe behoben werden.
- **Major:** Signifikanter Fehler oder Luecke. Muss behoben werden, kann aber terminiert werden.
- **Minor:** Verbesserungsvorschlag, Stil, Lesbarkeit. Behebung empfohlen.
## 5. Entscheidung
| Entscheidung |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] Freigegeben |
| [ ] Bedingt freigegeben (nach Behebung der Critical/Major Findings) |
| [ ] Nicht freigegeben (erneutes Review erforderlich) |
**Bedingungen fuer bedingte Freigabe:**
[Falls zutreffend: welche Findings muessen behoben werden, wer prueft die Behebung]
## 6. Unterschriften / Nachweis
| Rolle | Name | Datum | Nachweis |
|----------------------|---------------------|-------------|------------------------------|
| Moderator | [Name] | [Datum] | [Unterschrift / GitLab-MR-Approval] |
| Reviewer 1 | [Name] | [Datum] | [Unterschrift / GitLab-MR-Approval] |
| Reviewer 2 | [Name] | [Datum] | [Unterschrift / GitLab-MR-Approval] |
| Autor | [Name] | [Datum] | |
**GitLab-MR-Link:** [URL zum Merge Request, falls zutreffend]
---
*Dieses Protokoll wird im GitLab-Wiki unter Review-Protokolle/ abgelegt.*