Files
dev-process/templates/Review-Minutes-template.md
T
Stefan Lohmaier 247b8311f3 refactor(i18n): rename vorlagen/ -> templates/, *-vorlage -> *-template
Final German naming cleanup in dev-process:
- vorlagen/                            -> templates/
- vorlagen-word/                       -> templates-word/
- tools/generate_word_vorlagen.sh      -> tools/generate_word_templates.sh
- *-vorlage.md / *-vorlage.docx        -> *-template.md / *-template.docx
- Review-Protokoll-vorlage.*           -> Review-Minutes-template.*
- angebot-vorlage.*                    -> quote-template.*
- angebot-beispiel.html                -> quote-example.html

All references in README.md, toolstack/toolstack.md, build_word_template.py,
and generate_word_templates.sh updated. The master Word style template
(slohmaier-doc-template.docx) was already English-named.

The dev-process repo is now fully English in both content and structure.
2026-05-12 12:09:06 -07:00

3.5 KiB

Review Minutes

Field Value
Date [YYYY-MM-DD]
Review type [Peer review / Technical review / Inspection]
Moderator [Name]
Minute keeper [Name]

1. Participants

Name Role Present
[Name] Moderator Yes / No
[Name] Author Yes / No
[Name] Reviewer Yes / No
[Name] Reviewer Yes / No

2. Reviewed work product

Field Value
Work product [e.g. architecture documentation, module XY, requirements SWR-040 to SWR-060]
Version / commit [Version or git commit hash]
Gitea reference [PR link / wiki page / issue numbers]

3. Review preparation

Reviewer Preparation time (h) Preparation complete
[Name] [X] Yes / No
[Name] [X] Yes / No

4. Findings

ID Description Severity Responsible Due Status
F-01 [Finding description] Critical / Major / Minor [Name] [Date] Open
F-02 [Finding description] Critical / Major / Minor [Name] [Date] Open
F-03 [Finding description] Critical / Major / Minor [Name] [Date] Open

Severities

  • Critical: Safety-relevant or functionally wrong. Must be fixed before release.
  • Major: Significant defect or gap. Must be fixed but may be scheduled.
  • Minor: Improvement suggestion, style, readability. Fix recommended.

5. Decision

Decision
[ ] Approved
[ ] Conditionally approved (after fixing Critical/Major findings)
[ ] Not approved (re-review required)

Conditions for conditional approval: [If applicable: which findings must be fixed, who verifies the fix]

6. Signatures / evidence

Role Name Date Evidence
Moderator [Name] [Date] [Signature / Gitea PR approval]
Reviewer 1 [Name] [Date] [Signature / Gitea PR approval]
Reviewer 2 [Name] [Date] [Signature / Gitea PR approval]
Author [Name] [Date]

Gitea PR link: [URL to the pull request, if applicable]


These minutes are kept in the Gitea wiki under review-minutes/.