fb2c083551
Validate / build-test (macos-latest) (push) Failing after 3s
Validate / build-test (windows-latest) (push) Failing after 15s
Validate / build-test (ubuntu-latest) (push) Successful in 17s
Validate / reports (push) Successful in 50s
Release / release (push) Successful in 50s
Phase 2 of the English translation: Word documents (filled, EPB-specific): - 8 plans (PID, PM, QA, SWE, Test, Project Manual, CM, RM) - 6 safety docs (HARA, Safety Case, FMEDA, MISRA Compliance, Verification Report, Tool Qualification Cppcheck) - 2 manuals (User, Service) - 3 audit artefacts (Review minutes, NC-001, MISRA-REC-001) - All regenerated via pandoc from English markdown sources Code, tests, headers: - All file headers, struct comments, function docstrings in English - All test names (TEST_BEGIN strings) translated - Inline comments translated - 46 tests still green after translation CI workflows: - All step names in English - Step descriptions, comments, release notes template in English README.md fully rewritten in English with proper guided tour. Phase 3 (still pending): dev-process repo templates + toolstack/setup docs.
109 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
109 lines
5.0 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
doc-id: SLM-EPB-RM-001
|
||
version: 1.0
|
||
status: Released
|
||
date: 2026-05-12
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Risk Management Plan (RM Plan)
|
||
|
||
| Field | Value |
|
||
|---------------|----------------------------------------|
|
||
| Project | demo-epb |
|
||
| Document ID | SLM-EPB-RM-001 |
|
||
| Version | 1.0 |
|
||
| Status | Released |
|
||
| Date | 2026-05-12 |
|
||
| Standard | ASPICE MAN.5 |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Purpose
|
||
|
||
Identifies, assesses, and treats **project risks** (organisational, technical, schedule, resource). Distinct from **functional safety risks** (hazards), which live in the HARA.
|
||
|
||
## 2. Methodology
|
||
|
||
| Step | Activity |
|
||
|-------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|
||
| 1. Identification | Workshops, lessons learned, stakeholder input |
|
||
| 2. Classification | Probability (P) × Impact (I) |
|
||
| 3. Assessment | Risk score = P × I (1-25) |
|
||
| 4. Treatment | Avoid / Mitigate / Accept / Transfer |
|
||
| 5. Monitoring | Quarterly review, status updates |
|
||
|
||
### 2.1 Classification scale
|
||
|
||
| Probability | Meaning |
|
||
|-------------|----------------------------|
|
||
| 1 | Very unlikely |
|
||
| 2 | Unlikely |
|
||
| 3 | Possible |
|
||
| 4 | Likely |
|
||
| 5 | Very likely |
|
||
|
||
| Impact | Meaning |
|
||
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|
||
| 1 | Negligible |
|
||
| 2 | Minor delay / additional effort |
|
||
| 3 | Noticeable impact on schedule/budget |
|
||
| 4 | Significant impact, project at risk |
|
||
| 5 | Project stop |
|
||
|
||
| Score range | Action |
|
||
|-------------|----------------------------------------|
|
||
| 1-4 | Accept, monitor |
|
||
| 5-9 | Mitigate (plan) |
|
||
| 10-15 | Mitigate (immediate, with escalation) |
|
||
| 16-25 | Escalate to Project Owner |
|
||
|
||
## 3. Risk register
|
||
|
||
| ID | Description | P | I | Score | Treatment | Status |
|
||
|-------|----------------------------------------------------------|---|---|-------|------------------------------------------|------------|
|
||
| R-01 | Demo is mistaken for production-ready code | 3 | 3 | 9 | Disclaimer in README + Project Manual | Mitigated |
|
||
| R-02 | MISRA tooling update breaks CI (false positives) | 2 | 3 | 6 | Pin tool versions, regression suite | Mitigated |
|
||
| R-03 | Reviewer availability for ASIL-D | 3 | 4 | 12 | Self-review documented (demo only) | Accepted (demo) |
|
||
| R-04 | Gitea server outage | 2 | 4 | 8 | Local clones, regular backups | Mitigated |
|
||
| R-05 | Apple certificate expiry without warning | 3 | 3 | 9 | Renewal reminder + 30-day notice | Mitigated |
|
||
| R-06 | Windows build VM unreliable (busybox-PATH conflicts) | 4 | 2 | 8 | MSYS2 documented, alt PATH ordering | Open |
|
||
| R-07 | macOS act_runner host-mode cache bug | 3 | 2 | 6 | continue-on-error, documented | Open |
|
||
| R-08 | Doorstop tool compatibility on upgrade | 2 | 3 | 6 | Own traceability.py, no doorstop dep | Mitigated |
|
||
| R-09 | Knowledge loss with single-person setup | 4 | 4 | 16 | Maintain Project Manual + documentation | Open |
|
||
|
||
## 4. Risk reviews
|
||
|
||
| Frequency | Participants | Outputs |
|
||
|--------------|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|
||
| Quarterly | Project Owner + TL | Updated register, action items |
|
||
| On change | Affected roles | Risk score update |
|
||
| At release | Project Owner + QA | Residual-risk assessment |
|
||
|
||
## 5. Escalation path
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Risk owner (daily)
|
||
│ Score > 9
|
||
▼
|
||
Project Owner (weekly)
|
||
│ Score > 15
|
||
▼
|
||
Stakeholder / Client (immediately)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
## 6. Lessons learned
|
||
|
||
Closed risks are summarised at project closure under `docs/lessons-learned/`, to better assess follow-up projects.
|
||
|
||
## 7. Related documents
|
||
|
||
- `PM-Plan.docx` — Top-level risks (summary)
|
||
- `HARA.docx` — Functional safety risks (hazards, separate from project risks)
|
||
- `QA-Plan.docx` — Non-conformity management
|
||
|
||
## 8. Revision history
|
||
|
||
| Version | Date | Change | Author |
|
||
|---------|-------------|---------------------|------------|
|
||
| 1.0 | 2026-05-12 | First release | S. Lohmaier|
|