feat(i18n): full English translation of demo-epb
Validate / build-test (macos-latest) (push) Failing after 3s
Validate / build-test (windows-latest) (push) Failing after 15s
Validate / build-test (ubuntu-latest) (push) Successful in 17s
Validate / reports (push) Successful in 50s
Release / release (push) Successful in 50s
Validate / build-test (macos-latest) (push) Failing after 3s
Validate / build-test (windows-latest) (push) Failing after 15s
Validate / build-test (ubuntu-latest) (push) Successful in 17s
Validate / reports (push) Successful in 50s
Release / release (push) Successful in 50s
Phase 2 of the English translation: Word documents (filled, EPB-specific): - 8 plans (PID, PM, QA, SWE, Test, Project Manual, CM, RM) - 6 safety docs (HARA, Safety Case, FMEDA, MISRA Compliance, Verification Report, Tool Qualification Cppcheck) - 2 manuals (User, Service) - 3 audit artefacts (Review minutes, NC-001, MISRA-REC-001) - All regenerated via pandoc from English markdown sources Code, tests, headers: - All file headers, struct comments, function docstrings in English - All test names (TEST_BEGIN strings) translated - Inline comments translated - 46 tests still green after translation CI workflows: - All step names in English - Step descriptions, comments, release notes template in English README.md fully rewritten in English with proper guided tour. Phase 3 (still pending): dev-process repo templates + toolstack/setup docs.
This commit is contained in:
+47
-47
@@ -1,67 +1,67 @@
|
||||
# Qualitaetssicherungs-Plan (QA-Plan)
|
||||
# Quality Assurance Plan (QA Plan)
|
||||
|
||||
| Feld | Wert |
|
||||
| Field | Value |
|
||||
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|
|
||||
| Projekt | demo-epb |
|
||||
| Datum | 2026-05-11 |
|
||||
| Project | demo-epb |
|
||||
| Date | 2026-05-11 |
|
||||
| Version | 1.0 |
|
||||
| Status | Freigegeben |
|
||||
| Status | Released |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Qualitaetsziele
|
||||
## 1. Quality goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Vollstaendige Traceability: SYS → SA → SWE → SWA → Code → Test
|
||||
- 0 MISRA-Required-Violations (Deviations dokumentiert)
|
||||
- 0 statische-Analyse-Findings auf High/Error-Level
|
||||
- Coverage-Ziele (siehe SWE-Plan Abschnitt 8) eingehalten
|
||||
- Alle PRs reviewed und approved
|
||||
- Complete traceability: SYS → SA → SWE → SWA → Code → Test
|
||||
- 0 MISRA Required violations (deviations documented)
|
||||
- 0 static-analysis findings at High / Error level
|
||||
- Coverage targets met (see SWE Plan section 8)
|
||||
- All PRs reviewed and approved
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Qualitaetsmassnahmen
|
||||
## 2. Quality measures
|
||||
|
||||
| Massnahme | Tool / Methode | Frequenz |
|
||||
|---------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------|
|
||||
| Traceability-Check | `doorstop check` | jeder Push |
|
||||
| MISRA-Check | Cppcheck + MISRA-Addon | jeder Push |
|
||||
| Static Analysis | Cppcheck, clang-tidy | jeder Push |
|
||||
| Unit Tests | CppUTest | jeder Push |
|
||||
| Coverage | gcov / lcov | jeder Push |
|
||||
| Peer Review | Gitea PRs | jede Aenderung |
|
||||
| Architektur-Review | Technical Review, 2 Approver | bei Aenderung |
|
||||
| Audit-Vorbereitung | doorstop publish + Word-Doku | bei Release |
|
||||
| Measure | Tool / Method | Frequency |
|
||||
|----------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------|
|
||||
| Traceability check | `doorstop check` | every push |
|
||||
| MISRA check | Cppcheck + MISRA addon | every push |
|
||||
| Static analysis | Cppcheck, clang-tidy | every push |
|
||||
| Unit tests | CppUTest | every push |
|
||||
| Coverage | gcov / lcov | every push |
|
||||
| Peer review | Gitea PRs | every change |
|
||||
| Architecture review | Technical review, 2 approvers | on changes |
|
||||
| Audit preparation | doorstop publish + Word docs | on release |
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Reviews
|
||||
|
||||
| Artefakt | Review-Typ | Min. Approver |
|
||||
|-----------------------------|-------------------|----------------|
|
||||
| Anforderungen | Technical Review | 1 |
|
||||
| Architektur-Element | Technical Review | 2 |
|
||||
| Code (QM / ASIL-A/B) | Peer Review | 1 |
|
||||
| Code (ASIL-C/D) | Technical Review | 2 |
|
||||
| Plaene und Berichte | Peer Review | 1 |
|
||||
| MISRA Deviation Permit | Technical Lead | 1 |
|
||||
| Artefact | Review type | Min. approvers |
|
||||
|--------------------------------|---------------------|-----------------|
|
||||
| Requirements | Technical review | 1 |
|
||||
| Architecture element | Technical review | 2 |
|
||||
| Code (QM / ASIL-A/B) | Peer review | 1 |
|
||||
| Code (ASIL-C/D) | Technical review | 2 |
|
||||
| Plans and reports | Peer review | 1 |
|
||||
| MISRA deviation permit | Technical lead | 1 |
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Non-Conformity Management
|
||||
## 4. Non-conformity management
|
||||
|
||||
Abweichungen vom Plan oder von Anforderungen werden als Non-Conformity (NC) dokumentiert:
|
||||
Deviations from the plan or from requirements are documented as a non-conformity (NC):
|
||||
|
||||
- Pfad: `docs/non-conformities/NC-XXX.docx`
|
||||
- Jede NC erhaelt eine eindeutige ID
|
||||
- Schwere-Klassifizierung: Critical / Major / Minor
|
||||
- Korrekturmassnahme und Verifikation werden nachgehalten
|
||||
- Beispiel-NC vorhanden: NC-001
|
||||
- Path: `docs/non-conformities/NC-XXX.docx`
|
||||
- Each NC has a unique ID
|
||||
- Severity classification: Critical / Major / Minor
|
||||
- Corrective action and verification are tracked
|
||||
- Example NC present: NC-001
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Audit-Vorbereitung
|
||||
## 5. Audit preparation
|
||||
|
||||
Audit-Faehigkeit wird durchgehend erhalten:
|
||||
Audit readiness is maintained continuously:
|
||||
|
||||
- Git-History ist Audit-Trail (kein direkter Push auf `main`)
|
||||
- `docs/plans-md/` enthaelt die freigegebenen Plaene (Word in `docs/` daneben)
|
||||
- `docs/traceability/` enthaelt automatisch generierte Matrizen
|
||||
- `misra/records/` enthaelt MISRA-Deviation-Records
|
||||
- `tests/results/` enthaelt Test- und Coverage-Reports (CI-Artefakte)
|
||||
- `docs/reviews/` enthaelt Review-Protokolle
|
||||
- Git history is the audit trail (no direct push to `main`)
|
||||
- `docs/plans-md/` holds the released plans (Word in `docs/` alongside)
|
||||
- `docs/traceability/` holds the auto-generated matrices
|
||||
- `misra/records/` holds MISRA deviation records
|
||||
- `tests/results/` holds test and coverage reports (CI artefacts)
|
||||
- `docs/reviews/` holds review minutes
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Verbesserungsmassnahmen
|
||||
## 6. Improvement actions
|
||||
|
||||
Jeder Sprint-Abschluss enthaelt eine kurze Lessons-Learned-Notiz in `docs/lessons-learned/`. In dieser Demo verzichtet, da Single-Sprint-Projekt.
|
||||
Every sprint closure includes a brief lessons-learned note in `docs/lessons-learned/`. Skipped in this demo because it is a single-sprint project.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user